Hi all,
as my subject line suggests I like to know if new ZFS now supports autoreplace. In previous releases (v28) the option was available but not implemented for FreeBSD.
This is the old XigmaNAS forum in read only mode,
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
Does v5000 now support "autoreplace" ?
-
prior_philip
- NewUser

- Posts: 6
- Joined: 13 May 2013 23:51
- Status: Offline
- raulfg3
- Site Admin

- Posts: 4865
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012 22:13
- Location: Madrid (ESPAÑA)
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: Does v5000 now support "autoreplace" ?
sorry, not sure, because I do not find acurate info.
need to test, but at this time I do not have enought time/resources to do, perhaps another user can test / check if Autoreplace works finally on BSD.
This is what I find for previous version ZFSv28: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/free ... 13351.html
but none acurate for ZFSv5000
need to test, but at this time I do not have enought time/resources to do, perhaps another user can test / check if Autoreplace works finally on BSD.
This is what I find for previous version ZFSv28: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/free ... 13351.html
but none acurate for ZFSv5000
12.1.0.4 - Ingva (revision 7743) on SUPERMICRO X8SIL-F 8GB of ECC RAM, 11x3TB disk in 1 vdev = Vpool = 32TB Raw size , so 29TB usable size (I Have other NAS as Backup)
Wiki
Last changes
HP T510
Wiki
Last changes
HP T510
-
gjarboni
- NewUser

- Posts: 2
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014 05:16
- Status: Offline
Re: Does v5000 now support "autoreplace" ?
Unfortunately, the answer appears to be no. I've tried creating multiple pools (6 x Mirror, 11 x RAIDZ2) and have turned autoreplace on. But when I offline a drive, nothing happens. Each time I have to manually tell ZFS to use a spare drive.
Here's the output from the relevant commands:
I am new to ZFS and Nas4Free, so maybe I missed something? If not, I assume this means that even if I booted with my array connected to a server running FreeBSD 10, autoreplace would still not work?
Jason M.
Here's the output from the relevant commands:
Code: Select all
nas4free: ~ # zpool status
pool: AmySchumer
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
AmySchumer ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
da0 ONLINE 0 0 0
da1 ONLINE 0 0 0
da2 ONLINE 0 0 0
da3 ONLINE 0 0 0
da4 ONLINE 0 0 0
da5 ONLINE 0 0 0
da6 ONLINE 0 0 0
da7 ONLINE 0 0 0
da8 ONLINE 0 0 0
da9 ONLINE 0 0 0
da10 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
da11 AVAIL
da12 AVAIL
da13 AVAIL
nas4free: ~ # zpool get all AmySchumer
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
AmySchumer size 3T -
AmySchumer capacity 0% -
AmySchumer altroot - default
AmySchumer health ONLINE -
AmySchumer guid 12839006967930676292 default
AmySchumer version - default
AmySchumer bootfs - default
AmySchumer delegation on default
AmySchumer autoreplace on local
AmySchumer cachefile - default
AmySchumer failmode wait default
AmySchumer listsnapshots off default
AmySchumer autoexpand off default
AmySchumer dedupditto 0 default
AmySchumer dedupratio 1.00x -
AmySchumer free 3.00T -
AmySchumer allocated 840K -
AmySchumer readonly off -
AmySchumer comment - default
AmySchumer expandsize 0 -
AmySchumer freeing 0 default
AmySchumer feature@async_destroy enabled local
AmySchumer feature@empty_bpobj enabled local
AmySchumer feature@lz4_compress enabled local
nas4free: ~ # zpool offline AmySchumer da0
nas4free: ~ # zpool status
pool: AmySchumer
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has been taken offline by the administrator.
Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a
degraded state.
action: Online the device using 'zpool online' or replace the device with
'zpool replace'.
scan: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
AmySchumer DEGRADED 0 0 0
raidz2-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0
5198184294963300961 OFFLINE 0 0 0 was /dev/da0
da1 ONLINE 0 0 0
da2 ONLINE 0 0 0
da3 ONLINE 0 0 0
da4 ONLINE 0 0 0
da5 ONLINE 0 0 0
da6 ONLINE 0 0 0
da7 ONLINE 0 0 0
da8 ONLINE 0 0 0
da9 ONLINE 0 0 0
da10 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
da11 AVAIL
da12 AVAIL
da13 AVAIL
errors: No known data errors
Jason M.
-
gjarboni
- NewUser

- Posts: 2
- Joined: 15 Mar 2014 05:16
- Status: Offline
Re: Does v5000 now support "autoreplace" ?
One more thing. FreeBSD is currently developing zfsd which will handle auto replacing defective or offline drives. It will hopefully make it into 10.1.