This is the old XigmaNAS forum in read only mode,
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!



I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!

Have I made what I think I've made?!

Forum rules
Set-Up GuideFAQsForum Rules
Post Reply
Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

I wanted to create a ZFS RAID 10 equivalent - I have 6 1Tb drives and I want an available capacity of circa 3Tb from this.

I want all data duplicating across 2 drives so that 1 drive failure can never result in me losing anything.

My ZFS looks like this:

pool: NAS
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
NAS ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada1 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada2 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada3 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada4 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada5 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada6 ONLINE 0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

It looks right, but is it right - I've got a circa 3Tb drive from this.

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by b0ssman »

yes it looks right.

but consider this. in this configuration depending on which drives fail you can loose between 1 to 3 drives and have your data still accessible.

if you where to use raidz3 you could have any 3 drives fail and your data would still be accessible.
Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by b0ssman »

see this

http://www.servethehome.com/raid-calcul ... tdl-model/

raidz3 is WAY more secure for your data at the same capacity.
Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.

User avatar
ChriZathens
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 758
Joined: 23 Jun 2012 09:14
Location: Athens, Greece
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by ChriZathens »

In fact, due to the low capacity of your drives, you are fairly safe to use raidz2 and have almost 4TB of available space
My Nas
  1. Case: Fractal Design Define R2
  2. M/B: Supermicro x9scl-f
  3. CPU: Intel Celeron G1620
  4. RAM: 16GB DDR3 ECC (2 x Kingston KVR1333D3E9S/8G)
  5. PSU: Chieftec 850w 80+ modular
  6. Storage: 8x2TB HDDs in a RaidZ2 array ~ 10.1 TB usable disk space
  7. O/S: XigmaNAS 11.2.0.4.6625 -amd64 embedded
  8. Extra H/W: Dell Perc H310 SAS controller, crosflashed to LSI 9211-8i IT mode, 8GB Innodisk D150SV SATADOM for O/S

Backup Nas: U-NAS NSC-400, Gigabyte MB10-DS4 (4x4TB Seagate Exos disks in RaidZ configuration - 32GB RAM)

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

If I used raidz2 how many drives could I lose before I started losing data?

The NAS box I've got only has 2Gb of RAM, would this cause an issue using raidz2?

Could anyone explain how I would setup raidz2 please?

User avatar
raulfg3
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4865
Joined: 22 Jun 2012 22:13
Location: Madrid (ESPAÑA)
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by raulfg3 »

Primus84 wrote:Could anyone explain how I would setup raidz2 please?
from webGUI Disks|ZFS|Pools|Virtual device:

1 - select disks you want to be part of the RaidZ2
2 - select RaidZ2 as type of pool and apply.

http://wiki.nas4free.org/doku.php?id=do ... ual_device
http://wiki.nas4free.org/doku.php?id=do ... management

more info: https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?th ... oobs.7775/
12.1.0.4 - Ingva (revision 7743) on SUPERMICRO X8SIL-F 8GB of ECC RAM, 11x3TB disk in 1 vdev = Vpool = 32TB Raw size , so 29TB usable size (I Have other NAS as Backup)

Wiki
Last changes

HP T510

User avatar
crowi
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 1176
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 16:18
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by crowi »

If I used raidz2 how many drives could I lose before I started losing data?
You can lose two disks in Z2
NAS 1: Milchkuh: Asrock C2550D4I, Intel Avoton C2550 Quad-Core, 16GB DDR3 ECC, 5x3TB WD Red RaidZ1 +60 GB SSD for ZIL/L2ARC, APC-Back UPS 350 CS, NAS4Free 11.0.0.4.3460 embedded
NAS 2: Backup: HP N54L, 8 GB ECC RAM, 4x4 TB WD Red, RaidZ1, NAS4Free 11.0.0.4.3460 embedded
NAS 3: Office: HP N54L, 8 GB ECC RAM, 2x3 TB WD Red, ZFS Mirror, APC-Back UPS 350 CS NAS4Free 11.0.0.4.3460 embedded

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

Wow, previously performance was like 30mb/sec, it's now in RAIDZ2 and it's over 90mb/sec!

Is this now right:
pool: NAS
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
NAS ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
ada1.nop ONLINE 0 0 0
ada2.nop ONLINE 0 0 0
ada3.nop ONLINE 0 0 0
ada4.nop ONLINE 0 0 0
ada5.nop ONLINE 0 0 0
ada6.nop ONLINE 0 0 0

errors: No known data errors

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by b0ssman »

yes.

btw are you using ecc memory?
Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

No, just 2Gb of standard DDR3

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by b0ssman »

Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

Yeah I'm gonna order some in the next month or so, is there anyway to ensure/check that the data I have copied across in the meantime is good?

(I've got another copy of the data I'm currently transferring onto the NAS and I won't delete it until I know the data on the NAS is good.)

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by b0ssman »

you cant use ecc memory on most motherboards.
Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

Ah well, does this mean this has all been a waste of time?

Should I just go back to RAID10 software RAID?

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

Due to horrendous software RAID10 performance I'm back on RAIDZ2 and I'll take my chances I think.

Captain Ron
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 14
Joined: 03 Jul 2012 19:33
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Captain Ron »

ECC/non-ECC - I wouldn't say you wasted your time. I think it is important to understand the interactions of you hardware and software. And when using a file system like ZFS, the issues that can arise using non-ECC memory.

I ran my last NAS on non-ECC for years without problem. But that doesn't mean that your NAS won't have any issues. It just means that anecdotally, people have run without ECC and been fine. (And when I rebuilt my NAS, I used ECC).

For a little more security, you could always stress test your RAM and gain some confidence. But understand the risks, do some backups, and you should be fine.
Breaker: NAS4Free 11.0.0.4r3330 x64-full
Intel Celeron G1850 @ 2.90GHz, Supermicro X10SLM-F
16 GB ECC RAM
Intel PCI-E GigE Card & Dual Onboard Intel GigE
16GB SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 Flash Drive
4 x Western Digital Red 3TB HDD (ZFS Storage/Share)
Antec Performance One P180 Silver

Primus84
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Mar 2015 22:05
Status: Offline

Re: Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by Primus84 »

I have now sourced a replacement MB, CPU and RAM - Intel Core 2 Extreme with 4Gb of ECC RAM - slightly slower CPU than the i3 I was using but now I'll have ECC RAM when I install it tomorrow.

Once it's up and running and I import the hard drives what can I do to verify they haven't already corrupted, or would I be better restarting with them and copying everything back onto them from scratch to be sure?

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Have I made what I think I've made?!

Post by b0ssman »

You could create a md5sum for each file and compare it to make sure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post Reply

Return to “ZFS (only!)”