Wrong (different) size of pool free space displayed on Status|System (index.php) and Disks|ZFS|Configuration|Detected

[crest]

Used system:
NAS4Free 9.3.0.2 (revision 1681) x64-embedded
7641MS A7641100 AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4576MiB RAM

bus=1 hubaddr=6 port=5 devaddr=2 interface=0 AMD SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB
controller AMD SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB 2.0 controller PLIP network
interface RTL8169S/8110S/8211 1000BASE-T media interface

---

Subject:
Wrong (different) size of pool free space displayed on Status|System (index.php)
and Disks|ZFS|Configuration|Detected

---

Description:
Status|System shows a free space of 29.1G for my ZFS pool Pool1

screen_20150723_083617.png

in Disks|ZFS|Configuration|Detected there is only 1.45M of free space displayed.

screen_20150723_083722.png

One of the two displayed values is obviously wrong when I compare with the
output of Diagnostics|Information|Space Used under column available:

Code: Select all

Filesystem                     Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/xmd0                      119M     34M     85M    29%    /
devfs                          1.0k    1.0k      0B   100%    /dev
/dev/xmd1                      719M    253M    465M    35%    /usr/local
procfs                         4.0k    4.0k      0B   100%    /proc
Pool1                          332G    332G    1.7M   100%    /mnt/Pool1

I would tend that the value on Status|System is wrong.
Pls can someone verify these difference!

Regards
crest

[ChriZathens]

My system, respectively (using 9.3.0.2 - Nayla (revision 1310)):
Status|system

Capture1.PNG

Disks|ZFS|Configuration|Detected

Capture2.PNG

Diagnostics|Information|Space Used

Capture3.PNG

To my understanding this changed sometime in 9.3 brand and Status|system is not calculating the parity space (or something like that, never paid much attention)

[crest]

My system, respectively (using 9.3.0.2 - Nayla (revision 1310)):

...

To my understanding this changed sometime in 9.3 brand and Status|system is not calculating the parity space (or something like that, never paid much attention)

Thank you for the fast response!

I noticed this discrepance in 9.3 for the first time, must check what changed there but as you said, it's not a big deal ...