What puzzled me was the sheer speed of resilvering. My NAS consists of 6x 4 TB disks in one pool that is at 78 % capacity. I expected the resilvering to write 78 % of data to the "replaced" disk. Instead I got this:
Code: Select all
scan: resilvered 16.6G in 0h56m with 0 errors on Thu Nov 19 19:54:49 2015After some research on the net, I found out that I should have formatted the disk and used the "replace" command. I used the "online" command because I was hoping that ZFS would accept the disk as the same (already containing data) instead of a new "virgin" disk. But even in that case, wouldn't ZFS have to check the data and read ~3 TB of data?
I am running a scrub now ...


