Rsync client : "Extra options" overwriten by "1"

[nickous]

Hi
Is there a webGUI bug on the "Extra options" rsync client parameter ?
When I save or execute the job, this parameter is always overwritten by "1"
It doesnt save what you enter...
Moreover, if you enter an option (for ex "--include=toto/*") and "Execute now" at once, the job is well run, the extra options well considered. All is good except for the "Extra options" that are replaced by "1" at the end (for the next run).

I've been using Freenas7 since a long time
1 "master" Freenas (rsync client and rsync server) (backup on "backup" Freenas)
1 "backup" Freenas (rsync client)
severals PC Windows7 (with Deltacopy server) (backup on master Freenas)

I want to go now to Nas4Free (last build 457 embeded) but this rsync client extra option bug is a little annoying for a secure backup

Do you have the same behavior?
Where may I post the bug?

Edit 22/11/2012: I open a ticket on sourceforge nas4free project http://sourceforge.net/p/nas4free/bugs/56/
But can someone else confirm me the problem?

[derek_xi]

I have same issue as you. I added "--port==8370" to Extra options. When I execute right now, the parameter is working. But after that, it is overwritten by "1".
I am also looking for the solution:(

[unkis17]

Nickous,

I am experiencing the same issue, but i noticed a bit different. I am running 457 Embedded BTW.

I have been running the same Rync setup from FN7 and now I am seeing the problem. I just rebuilt the server from scratch (IE didn't use existing config file) just to clean it up.

Here is what I have been seeing, my rsync job does NOT work when I use the --exclude-from="xxx" command anymore. BUT if I take out the --exclude option then the job runs?

I have several other rsync jobs that run without options no problem.

Yes, after I type in extra options and leave the screen after hitting save I see the 1. I have also tried typing in extra options and "execute now" and it doesn't seem to work either.

Maybe someone can shed some light on this? I do know it used to work before I upgraded. If memory serves me correctly I went from 9.0 rev 249 to 9.1 rev 457.

[nickous]

It's good now with r570 (broken since r282)
many thanks daoyama

[unkis17]

Sorry for the long delay, I was out of town on business. I too have seen good results after upgrading to R573. Thank you Daoyama-san.