Well, the title says it all really.
I wanted to try to add a SSD to my zpool to see how performance would change.
Does anybody have experience on this? What is the minimum access time you would recommend?
I read somewhere that the size of the cache should be 30ish time the amount of RAM?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Solid-State-D ... 4165401a6e
Appreciated!
rs232
This is the old XigmaNAS forum in read only mode,
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
Let's talk about solid state - ZFS cache
-
rs232
- Starter

- Posts: 59
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012 13:48
- Status: Offline
- raulfg3
- Site Admin

- Posts: 4865
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012 22:13
- Location: Madrid (ESPAÑA)
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: Let's talk about solid state - ZFS cache
I can only speak about my experience, this mean that yours or others can be different.
I use a 90GB SSD and I do not notice any improvements on a week that I use it.
My scenario is a Home NAS , and only do esporadic transfer of medium / big files ( eg: video files, series, and photos), 5 or 6 times a week.
all files are diferent ones from others so really dificult for a cache device to find similar patterns.
So my recomendation for a HOME NAS is do not waste money/Disk, use to buy more RAM, but perhaps for SOHO or enterprise enviroments performance was slightly different.
PD: In all forums recomends to use 2 SSD in mirror to avoid data lost ( if use only one SSD and this SSD have problem, you lose your data too, not only your cache device).
I use a 90GB SSD and I do not notice any improvements on a week that I use it.
My scenario is a Home NAS , and only do esporadic transfer of medium / big files ( eg: video files, series, and photos), 5 or 6 times a week.
all files are diferent ones from others so really dificult for a cache device to find similar patterns.
So my recomendation for a HOME NAS is do not waste money/Disk, use to buy more RAM, but perhaps for SOHO or enterprise enviroments performance was slightly different.
PD: In all forums recomends to use 2 SSD in mirror to avoid data lost ( if use only one SSD and this SSD have problem, you lose your data too, not only your cache device).
12.1.0.4 - Ingva (revision 7743) on SUPERMICRO X8SIL-F 8GB of ECC RAM, 11x3TB disk in 1 vdev = Vpool = 32TB Raw size , so 29TB usable size (I Have other NAS as Backup)
Wiki
Last changes
HP T510
Wiki
Last changes
HP T510
- ChriZathens
- Forum Moderator

- Posts: 758
- Joined: 23 Jun 2012 09:14
- Location: Athens, Greece
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: Let's talk about solid state - ZFS cache
Although I personally have no experience with ZFS generally, from what I read here and there, it is better to spend your money for more RAM and not for SSD cache disks..
My Nas
Backup Nas: U-NAS NSC-400, Gigabyte MB10-DS4 (4x4TB Seagate Exos disks in RaidZ configuration - 32GB RAM)
- Case: Fractal Design Define R2
- M/B: Supermicro x9scl-f
- CPU: Intel Celeron G1620
- RAM: 16GB DDR3 ECC (2 x Kingston KVR1333D3E9S/8G)
- PSU: Chieftec 850w 80+ modular
- Storage: 8x2TB HDDs in a RaidZ2 array ~ 10.1 TB usable disk space
- O/S: XigmaNAS 11.2.0.4.6625 -amd64 embedded
- Extra H/W: Dell Perc H310 SAS controller, crosflashed to LSI 9211-8i IT mode, 8GB Innodisk D150SV SATADOM for O/S
Backup Nas: U-NAS NSC-400, Gigabyte MB10-DS4 (4x4TB Seagate Exos disks in RaidZ configuration - 32GB RAM)
-
ku-gew
- Advanced User

- Posts: 172
- Joined: 29 Nov 2012 09:02
- Location: Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Status: Offline
Re: Let's talk about solid state - ZFS cache
I put a USB stick on my desktop installation of ZEVO ZFS and I also cannot see substantial changes in performances (a USB stick is still faster than an HDD for reads below 4 MB).
I think it makes sense only for databases, as written in the guide, where you have small reads and a lot of static data.
I think it makes sense only for databases, as written in the guide, where you have small reads and a lot of static data.
HP Microserver N40L, 8 GB ECC, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
XigmaNAS stable branch, always latest version
SMB, rsync
XigmaNAS stable branch, always latest version
SMB, rsync