This is the old XigmaNAS forum in read only mode,
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!



I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!

1TB "missing".

Forum rules
Set-Up GuideFAQsForum Rules
Post Reply
thedoginthewok
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 5
Joined: 02 Sep 2013 20:45
Status: Offline

1TB "missing".

Post by thedoginthewok »

Hello,

I've installed NAS4Free today and set up a RAIDZ1.

I have 8 WD Red 3TB Hard drives. According to this calculator

http://www.servethehome.com/raid-calculator/

It should give me 19.1 TB of usable space:
RAID-Z
*Raw Storage: 24.0 TB / 24000.0 GB
*Usable Storage: 19.1 TB / 19557.8 GB
RAID-Z uses one disk for Parity much like RAID5 and requires at least three drives to be used.


*Usable storage is the actual post-format amount where kilo = 1024, not 1000
This is what the NAS4Free webgui shows me:
Image

Where did the Terabyte go?

User avatar
Lee Sharp
Advanced User
Advanced User
Posts: 251
Joined: 13 May 2013 21:12
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: 1TB "missing".

Post by Lee Sharp »

Some space is also used for the intent log and snapshots, even if you have not yet taken any snapshots.

thedoginthewok
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 5
Joined: 02 Sep 2013 20:45
Status: Offline

Re: 1TB "missing".

Post by thedoginthewok »

Can I read something more about "some" space?

I just want to know how the drives are utilized. Is 1TB a high amount for an intent log and snapshots?

User avatar
b0ssman
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 2438
Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
Location: Munich, Germany
Status: Offline

Re: 1TB "missing".

Post by b0ssman »

the calculator does not take into account the zfs overhead for checksums, logs etc..

the calculated size for raid5 and raidz1 are identical.

what you are seeing in nas4free is the correct value.
Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.

User avatar
raulfg3
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4865
Joined: 22 Jun 2012 22:13
Location: Madrid (ESPAÑA)
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: 1TB "missing".

Post by raulfg3 »

I remember that UFS formated drives have 8% in size overhead to permit root login in case of filesystem full, perhaps ZFS have simmilar % overhead for the same reason, but I do not confirm this info.
12.1.0.4 - Ingva (revision 7743) on SUPERMICRO X8SIL-F 8GB of ECC RAM, 11x3TB disk in 1 vdev = Vpool = 32TB Raw size , so 29TB usable size (I Have other NAS as Backup)

Wiki
Last changes

HP T510

substr
experienced User
experienced User
Posts: 113
Joined: 04 Aug 2013 20:21
Status: Offline

Re: 1TB "missing".

Post by substr »

There should definitely be some 'missing.' Whether 1TB is the right number, I don't know.

There isn't anything 'wrong' though, I think you can be confident in that.

It wouldn't be possible to actually store 19TB on the array, because metadata is going to consume some of the space, and if you've properly selected 4K/advanced format when you created the pool, there will also be some space lost in padding. 7 data drives is not equal to 2/4/8, so the blocks are going to be split in uneven multiples of 4K. This will lead to 'missing' space, but I think it is lost 'along the way,' and can't be calculated in advance(the block size determines the % of padding loss).

thedoginthewok
NewUser
NewUser
Posts: 5
Joined: 02 Sep 2013 20:45
Status: Offline

Re: 1TB "missing".

Post by thedoginthewok »

Okay. Thanks to you all for the answers.

Post Reply

Return to “ZFS (only!)”