I have strange results from a iperf test.
PC1: physical NAs4Free based on HP N54L
PC2: ESXi 5.1 based VM running W2008R2 with BackupExec and a LTO Tape passed through.
because of slow running tape backups, I tested with iperf
iperf -s on the virtual machine and iperf -c on the HP54L gives me 936 Mbit/s, which seems to be a good value.
The other way round gives only 313 MBit/s
What can be the reason ?
P.S.: Another test with another VM behaves similar
This is the old XigmaNAS forum in read only mode,
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
interpretation of iperf results
-
drnicolas
- Advanced User
- Posts: 180
- Joined: 15 Aug 2013 14:03
- Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
- Status: Offline
interpretation of iperf results
HP Proliant N54L - Bios Mod -16GB non-ECC-RAM - ZFS RAIDZ1 (3x3TB) - 1VM running XigmaNAS 11.2.0.4.6026
-
raulfg3
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4865
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012 22:13
- Location: Madrid (ESPAÑA)
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Re: interpretation of iperf results
the LAN VM driver is not the best possible for your NIC. try other or try to put an INTEL NIC that have normally better support.drnicolas wrote:What can be the reason ?
12.1.0.4 - Ingva (revision 7743) on SUPERMICRO X8SIL-F 8GB of ECC RAM, 11x3TB disk in 1 vdev = Vpool = 32TB Raw size , so 29TB usable size (I Have other NAS as Backup)
Wiki
Last changes
HP T510
Wiki
Last changes
HP T510