nomizfs wrote:
These filenames are extremely confusing. First of all, why even bother with LiveCD, nobody burns CD's anymore, just forget that.
Second of all, why can't you have the text 'installer' in the filename of the images that are meant for installing, and 'update' in the filenames that are meant for updating?
The nas4free wiki is not acceptable, there is no master index, and i constantly find 'guides' deep in some forum thread that i never even knew about, totally absent from any 'master' wiki pages.
The installer suggests using the entire available space from the empty unformatted destination USB device as swap by default, pressing enter there as in going by defaults will result in an error.
regards, mike
I know this isn't the thread for discussing this, but these are all true and valid suggestions.
Even the the master Download link is unintuitive and I spent a minute clicking around nas4free -pages before I got it: the link is up in the header, not under "Downloads" -side bar link.
The first time I was installing this a year ago, it was difficult to find information about which file to download. LiveCD:s are traditionally for TESTING the product before installing. And since it read everywhere that embedded is the recommended install, of course I went and downloaded the "embedded"-file.
Last time I was updating from 9.2. to 9.3. branch I searched for half'n'hour trying to find out the benefits and necessity of a swap partition and finally find the answer from some FreeNAS-forum thread and some individual blog post about ZFS being a memory hog.
So It's a good update the preferred partition table is now in the "recommended" section, but I still haven't found out a clear and official reason for having a swap partition on USB stick.
Other than this general unintuivitity, I'm very pleased of this software and will donate. Thanks.