Hi,
I have always had this issue and never been able to fix it. I have an AMD board (Asus A99X EVO) with AMD 990X/SB950 chipset
and the SATA controller is discovered correctly as being 6Gbps capable:
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahci0: <AMD SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 AHCI SATA controller> port 0x5028-0x502f,0x5020-0x5023,0x5018-0x501f,0x5014-0x5017,0x5000-0x500f mem 0xfd4fe000-0xfd4fe3ff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci11
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahci0: AHCI v1.20 with 6 6Gbps ports, Port Multiplier supported
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahcich0: <AHCI channel> at channel 0 on ahci0
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahcich1: <AHCI channel> at channel 1 on ahci0
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahcich2: <AHCI channel> at channel 2 on ahci0
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahcich3: <AHCI channel> at channel 3 on ahci0
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahcich4: <AHCI channel> at channel 4 on ahci0
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ahcich5: <AHCI channel> at channel 5 on ahci0
However my WD RED SATA 3 disks are always running as SATA 2:
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ada0: <WDC WD30EFRX-68AX9N0 80.00A80> ATA-9 SATA 3.x device
Apr 18 15:58:29 nas4free kernel: ada0: 300.000MB/s transfers (SATA 2.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes)
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Western Digital Red (AF)
Device Model: WDC WD30EFRX-xxxxxx
Serial Number: WD-xxxxxxx
LU WWN Device Id: xxxxxx
Firmware Version: 80.00A80
User Capacity: 3,000,592,982,016 bytes [3.00 TB]
Sector Sizes: 512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: ACS-2 (minor revision not indicated)
SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is: Sat Apr 18 16:46:51 2015 CEST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
I am runing the latest 9.3 Nas4free
First I would be interested to know if some other people using a build in AMD SB950 controler are
able to run disks in SATA 3 mode ? Indicating then that it is not a limitation of the freebsd ahci driver.
Then I can maybe add that I am not directly running N4F on this HW, I run ESXi 5.5 and N4F is a VM
where I have passed through the SATA controler. Maybe the problem comes from here ? Don't know.
If some people have a similiar setting I would be very interested to know if they also have this issue.
This is the old XigmaNAS forum in read only mode,
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
it will taken offline by the end of march 2021!
I like to aks Users and Admins to rewrite/take over important post from here into the new fresh main forum!
Its not possible for us to export from here and import it to the main forum!
SATA 3 disk running at 300MB
- b0ssman
- Forum Moderator

- Posts: 2438
- Joined: 14 Feb 2013 08:34
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Status: Offline
Re: SATA 3 disk running at 300MB
please readjim71 wrote: Then I can maybe add that I am not directly running N4F on this HW, I run ESXi 5.5 and N4F is a VM
where I have passed through the SATA controler.
https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?th ... ine.12484/
Nas4Free 11.1.0.4.4517. Supermicro X10SLL-F, 16gb ECC, i3 4130, IBM M1015 with IT firmware. 4x 3tb WD Red, 4x 2TB Samsung F4, both GEOM AES 256 encrypted.
-
jim71
- Starter

- Posts: 22
- Joined: 09 Nov 2012 00:22
- Status: Offline
Re: SATA 3 disk running at 300MB
Thank you b0ssman. Interesting, and of course I do understand this is not an advised setup for production system, however
for my personnal home server this is perfectly fine as I cannot afford having 2 servers running 24x7 at home anyway
So I do PCI passthrough (not RDM) and have ECC ram and ZFS with 3 HDD. The VM datastore are on 2 other HDD in mirror on
a HW RAID controller. The ESX itself boot from an USB stick. This works very well since more than 2 years now
Frankly I am not convinced my data would be more secure runnning N4F directly on the same hardware (anyway I am doing
backups). Maybe I wouldn't have my issue with SATA 2 and 3, but this is the point of my post. If someone can confirm it is
running their HDD on SATA 3 mode on the same kind of hardware (AMD SB950) I would know it has something to do
with the virtualization.
for my personnal home server this is perfectly fine as I cannot afford having 2 servers running 24x7 at home anyway
So I do PCI passthrough (not RDM) and have ECC ram and ZFS with 3 HDD. The VM datastore are on 2 other HDD in mirror on
a HW RAID controller. The ESX itself boot from an USB stick. This works very well since more than 2 years now
Frankly I am not convinced my data would be more secure runnning N4F directly on the same hardware (anyway I am doing
backups). Maybe I wouldn't have my issue with SATA 2 and 3, but this is the point of my post. If someone can confirm it is
running their HDD on SATA 3 mode on the same kind of hardware (AMD SB950) I would know it has something to do
with the virtualization.